Article Summary:
Futamura's article Writing a Mathematical Art Manifesto, starts by highlighting the first art manifesto by Filippo Marinetti, the Manifesto of Futurism. Emphasizing the inspiration from Karl Marx and the use of strong imagery and fiery language. Aiming to introduce a new aesthetic, his manifesto was naming and rejecting an old paradigm just as much as it was about defining Futurism. Manifestos became a way for artists to distinguish themselves, during the modernist age. Becoming an art form in itself, manifestos were used to announce radical ideas and new directions to push the status quo.
In preparation for workshop, they discuss the beginnings of the foundations for a mathematical art manifesto, centering the perspective of creative human expression apposed to its usefulness as demonstration, illustration or pedagogy. Following the process of naming and rejecting an old paradigm to establish a new one, they needed to ensure not only an understanding of mathematical art but how it additionally rejects an artistic belief or norm.
The workshop structure:
- Facilitator introduces manifestos and goals
- In small groups discuss: What is mathematical art, or math/art, as a physical manifestation of creative expression?
-Groups share ideas
-Facilitator hands out images of artwork, in small groups discuss: Are the following works considered mathematical art according to your understanding of mathematical art as a physical manifestation of creative expression?
-Groups share ideas
-Facilitator goes more in depth of structure of the manifesto, presenting examples of rejected artistic paradigms.
- In small groups discuss: What established paradigm or tradition in art might we be rejecting through declaring that mathematical art or math/art is art? Specifically, what criticisms do we have about the established paradigm?
-Groups share ideas
- Facilitator leads reflection and creation of an outline for a mathematical manifesto
They acknowledge that some may argue that this contrasts the welcoming nature and inclusive spirit of many mathematical artists as seen at the Bridges Conference. Stating that most if not all artists use mathematics either consciously or unconsciously.
The article covers a recent history of art that uses mathematics, recognizing that mathematical art can be found far back in the history of many cultures before framing the focus of this article on visual artwork produced in the west in the 20th and 21st century. Many mathematical developments inspired artists in the 20th century, in these works the mathematics was not the focus but used as metaphors with transcendent experiences. Mathematical models have captivated and inspired artists who have created guided by intuition and pattern not necessarily a strict following of a mathematical equation. Artists re-discover mathematical ideas like the Mobius Strip and Riemann Surfaces, through artistic experimentation.
The introduction of computers fostered fascination with visualizations and mathematical curiosities, some images were just visualizations, but some mathematicians and computer sciences started to use computers as its own artistic medium. Carlos Sequin presented "Art, Math and Computers: New Ways of Creating Pleasing Shapes" at the first Bridges Conference, explaining his process of using a computer to virtually design complex geometric shapes similar to minimal surfaces that could be sculpted out of wood.
Art with underlying mathematical themes and processes became popular in the mathematical community in the 21st century, with support of established organizations like Bridges. Mathematical Art is still performed among people who primarily identify as artists, but increasingly there have been mathematicians who have found artistic expression through mathematical art.
In discussing what is mathematical art the article shares that mathematical art recently has be characterized as a subfield of mathematics. In Farris' 2021 article Mathematical Art as a Discipline he claims that mathematical art has become a discipline in its own right. George Hart places math/art within mathematics, and a liminal space in between. Mathematics connects to art in a variety of ways. They ask what if the focus on mathematical art as a form of creative expression over its practical purpose?
The article shifts to share the characteristics of a manifesto, sourcing from Hart's 2024 article What Can We Say About Math/Art"? he posed the question of if a mathematical art manifesto should be the goal, sharing that he believes that there is not enough consensus on the core values of mathematical art. Futamura shares that while the first Futurist Manifesto was written in 1909 over 50 more were written over the next decade, concluding that a group with common views can come together and write separate manifestos. While there are many different styles and content that can come together in a manifesto, from poetic forms to short numbered declarations, there is a general three step formula developed by Marinetti that many follow.
Steps:
1. Identify and define an established Paradigm in art.
2. Criticize the paradigm ( with strong passion)
3. Introduce a new paradigm to counter the old (again with strong passion).
Marinetti declares that a good manifesto "must have violence and precision, a specific accusation and a well-defined insult, wit and bombast, and a sense of style that mimics the art itself." (Futamura, 2025, p. 592)
The article shares specific artworks that may or may not be considered mathematical art, these are works that are not by known mathematical artists, followed by quotes from mathematical artists.
One of the works shared in the list was John Sims, Seeing Pi, felt fitting with Pi day coming up and was the only fiber arts based piece on the list.
Math artist John Sims is living a life of pi. QUARTZ. (2022, July 20). https://qz.com/quartzy/1571241/pi-day-math-artist-john-sims-creates-a-life-of-pi
"It is art that embraces the spirit, Language and process of mathematics. Both maths and art are concerned with truth, but they differ in their ways of searching for it. Maths uses analysis and proof; art uses the senses and emotions. But maths can harness the spirit of creativity and art can be analytical. Together they form a great alliance for understanding the world around us."
John Sims, Artist
(Futamura, 2025, p. 593)
Futamura concludes the article sharing examples of rejected paradigms from art manifestos, and that many more can be found in 100 Artists' Manifestos edited by Alex Danchev.
Stop 1: "if an artist decides that their art is mathematical art, then it is." (Futamura, 2025, p. 590)
I wonder if in their intention of this statement they were saying, mathematics just is and the line of weather art is mathematical art is in the artists acknowledgement of such, because it is present, it exists, so is it the naming, acknowledging, and seeing of it by the artist that is the determining factor.
Stop 2: "'Mathematics creates art'; 'Mathematics is art'; 'Mathematics renders artistic images'; 'Hidden mathematics an be discovered in art'; 'Mathematics analyzes art'; 'Mathematical ideas can be taught through art'" (Futamura, 2025, p. 591)
I really enjoyed this quote, the lens for art and math are so rooted in each other and I appreciated the way this quote summarized that.
I was intrigued by the works by Felix Klein and Alfred Clebsch that the article mentioned and looked up some of their works and saw similarities of these curved images and structures to the work Nick Sayers shared in their interview. Multiple points in the article there was mention of violence in writing manifestos, I found this to be a jarring word, after my first read through I wondered if its use was more intended to be provocative and invoke a reaction or feeling, if that's what their intent with the manifesto and with their use of words like violence in their description of it, when I started to reframe it with that as the intent I additionally considered the nude art pieces that Nick mentioned in the interview and how that could also be considered provocative to invoke a reaction or feeling.
Question:
What do you think defines mathematical art for you? Does it just exist? Are there specific defining features that are needed?
Futamura, F. (2025). Writing a Mathematical Art Manifesto. Bridges Conference, 589–594.
Math artist John Sims is living a life of pi. QUARTZ. (2022, July 20). https://qz.com/quartzy/1571241/pi-day-math-artist-john-sims-creates-a-life-of-pi
.jpg)



.jpg)







