Thursday, March 26, 2026

Week 8 Reading Reflection

 Article Summary:

Can zombies write mathematical poetry? Mathematical poetry as a model for humanistic mathematics

Karaali introduces this work with the statement that mathematics is a creative endeavour and that mathematics is a model for what makes an activity human. Supporting this by identifying three components that make humans special: cognition, consciousness, and creativity. They make the claim that mathematical poetry is  a tool for humanizing mathematics. 

The author frames their life-long love of reading, contrasting the different experience they had with poetry, finding it to be more cryptic. While they appreciated features of rhythm and fluency in poets works they found it hard and that created a distance for them, recounting a time later on where boredom was high and poetry found them, creating a natural connection where they flowed together. 

Shifting back to mathematics and poetry the author highlights the long standing claim of mathematicians that mathematics is beautiful. Revisiting their claim of what makes humans special they acknowledge the possibility of animals possessing some of these components but state that we are the only species that without a doubt have all three of these come together, and frames that in this work the word "human captures more that we are intelligent sentient creative beings, rather than that we are bipedal omnivorous talking animals descended from Homo sapiens." (Karaali, 2014, p. 39)

Karaali draws parallels between the poets work utilizing their humanity, creative spirit, thinking mind, and feeling heart in the creation of her works, and the mathematicians pursuit of their craft, creating with passion and frustration, using an analytical mind, and creative spirit to lead them. Focusing on the the experience of their respective works creations and not exclusively their product. Rooting both poetry and mathematics in language in their own ways, the conception of both can be "without or before language, but only with words will they become communicable and complete." (Karaali, 2014, p. 39)

The author shares that in their native language Turkish, sentence structure differs from that in English. describing the different ways they may decorate a person or object may be use different suffixes and they took advantage of this within the poetry they wrote. Using a stream of consciousness poetry style, composing so sentence thoughts squashed into each other, with reappearances of phrases and features in different sentences. Concerning themselves more with how the words came together more than how the whole piece would read, noting that punction is depended on to guide the reader though they avoided punction as it would interfere with their goal of producing overlapping meanings, prompting concern that if read aloud their poems would lose some of their intended meanings. Concluding that their poetry style remained rooted in Turkish but that their mathematical language was English as that was the language they studied it in, noting that their mathematics and poetry did not engage together, they were different languages and different worlds. 

Discussing creativity in mathematics there is questioning in what does creativity in mathematics mean? Noting for many it does not trigger ideas of creativity, considering students coursework we can ask this and the the idea of novel problems or approaches come to mind but for many is this not an idea from elsewhere taken out of original context and used. To have creativity in mathematics classrooms there must be a flexibility and openness to many interpretations and approaches. 

Humanistic mathematics has two different branches from the term. One is sourced around the notion of teaching mathematics humanistically, a call for a humanistic philosophy of mathematics instruction. While the other branch of ideas centered the notions of mathematics as a human endeavour.  The Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal has hosted many articles discussing and seeking to define the phrase though an ultimate definition has been avoided. The author shares their work with the Journal of Humanistic Mathematics (JHM) and their collaboration in determining the perspective for what JHM would consider to be humanistic mathematics which came to be scholarship or any form on inquiry that studies the human face of mathematics. Determining a mission to create an open forum for academic and informal discussions on all of the various threads of mathematical inquiry, sharing the welcoming of diverse contributions. Karaali then reflects on their personal experience in participating in a creative writing workshop and the growth opportunity it became, noting that in learning to let go of their creations and open to friendly criticism they were able to see and experience a poets struggles. Gaining a new respect for the work and energy that goes into their work and greater understanding and curiosity for writing processes.

Karaali and Huber decided to bring back a tradition of the Humanistic Mathematics Network and held a poetry reading with hopes of forming a tradition of mathematical poetry at the meeting of the American mathematical societies. Highlighting the support they received from JoAnne Growney and her blog on poetry with mathematics. Poetry submissions to the JHM was another prominent source of mathematical poetry for the author some of which they shared in the article and how this led to them experimenting with English as a vessel for their poetry. 

Karaali shares when they were assigned to teach a writing intensive course, developing it motivated by sharing humanistic mathematics as an engaging approach to mathematics. Titling the course 'Can zombies do math?' investigating within the course a range of ideas about both what makes us human and what in mathematics is related to our humanity. Introducing for the first time within one of their courses literacy and mathematics. Students enjoyed this having never considered both mathematics and poetry together, students were to create something that represents or plays with themes of the course, Karaali expected short stories and collages, and to their delight some created poetry, encouraging Karaali to think of other ways to incorporate mathematical poetry into classes. Having students create their own mathematical poetry, engaging creatively in ways they haven't before with mathematics, disrupting stereotypes of both what poetry and mathematics can be. 

Through personal, professional, and pedagogical experiences with mathematical poetry it has brought the conviction of the author that mathematical poetry is the perfect ambassador for humanistic mathematics. Poetry is inspirational, emotional, intellectual, by making connections across mathematics to poetry we may create metaphor for those wo have never had the opportunity to experience such through mathematical creation on their own. Encouraging the timid to venture into the world of mathematics as they have experienced both mathematics and poetry in emotional ways and poetry can be a means of releasing and sharing these emotions with others. 


Stop 1: "My mathematics and my poetry did not play together. They spoke different Languages. They were two different worlds. They came from two different sources." (Karaali, 2014, p. 40)

This made me stop as it reminded me of a conversation I was having with a student semi-recently. The student joined our school three years ago from Ukraine, arriving without much English experience prior. She has been having more troubles in math recently and she was expressing to me her frustration with connecting her prior knowledge to what we are doing now and the knowing she knows it but not in this way. 

I personally am monolingual and have attempted to learn some Spanish and learned a little French in school but have no frame of reference for these experiences that face the majority of my students. 

Stop 2: "The poet reaches within herself to grasp at her humanity, and her creative spirit engages productively with her thinking mind and feeling heart to forge germs of poetry within. But, perhaps less known to the public, the mathematician, too, is very much human in the process of pursuing her craft. She creates with passion and frustration, as she depends on her rational, logical and analytical mind and her intuitive, creative spirit to lead her to truth." (Karaali, 2014, p. 39)

I liked this comparison, I feel struggle and engagement and pursuit especially when it is something of interest to the one experiencing it is ultimately poetic. I remember first engaging with proofs and struggling wrapping my head around the structure and way of thinking but finding it to intriguing and when it clicked I remember feeling like it was its own language I could finally read and write. Thinking back on many of those early proofs I feel there is many places where they were poetic all on their own. I feel that the humanistic focus opened mathematical poetry to be a place for people to engage mathematically with poetry regardless of how they engage with traditional mathematics, creating an outlet for people who perhaps self-declare as "not math people" to find space to engage and express themselves alternatively. 


Question: How do you think mathematical poetry could be brought into the classroom for younger students? How can it be adjusted for elementary versus secondary? 


Karaali, G. (2014). Can zombies write mathematical poetry? mathematical poetry as a model for humanistic mathematics. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts, 8(1–2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2014.926685

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

Draft Project: Roots, Ratios, and Repurposing

Photos from trialing the project and edits to process, conclusion, and connections to literature will continue to be updated.













Photos from trialing the project and edits to process, conclusion, and connections to literature will continue to be updated.


Monday, March 2, 2026

Week 7 Reading Reflection

 Article Summary:


Futamura's article Writing a Mathematical Art Manifesto, starts by highlighting the first art manifesto by Filippo Marinetti, the Manifesto of Futurism. Emphasizing the inspiration from Karl Marx and the use of strong imagery and fiery language. Aiming to introduce a new aesthetic, his manifesto was naming and rejecting an old paradigm just as much as it was about defining Futurism. Manifestos became a way for artists to distinguish themselves, during the modernist age. Becoming an art form in itself, manifestos were used to announce radical ideas and new directions to push the status quo. 

In preparation for workshop, they discuss the beginnings of the foundations for a mathematical art manifesto, centering the perspective of creative human expression apposed to its usefulness as demonstration, illustration or pedagogy. Following the process of naming and rejecting an old paradigm to establish a new one, they needed to ensure not only an understanding of mathematical art but how it additionally rejects an artistic belief or norm. 

The workshop structure:

- Facilitator introduces manifestos and goals 

- In small groups discuss: What is mathematical art, or math/art, as a physical manifestation of creative expression? 

-Groups share ideas

-Facilitator hands out images of artwork, in small groups discuss: Are the following works considered mathematical art according to your understanding of mathematical art as a physical manifestation of creative expression?

-Groups share ideas

-Facilitator goes more in depth of structure of the manifesto, presenting examples of rejected artistic paradigms. 

- In small groups discuss: What established paradigm or tradition in art might we be rejecting through declaring that mathematical art or math/art is art? Specifically, what criticisms do we have about the established paradigm? 

-Groups share ideas

- Facilitator leads reflection and creation of an outline for a mathematical manifesto

They acknowledge that some may argue that this contrasts the welcoming nature and inclusive spirit of many mathematical artists as seen at the Bridges Conference. Stating that most if not all artists use mathematics either consciously or unconsciously. 

The article covers a recent history of art that uses mathematics, recognizing that mathematical art can be found far back in the history of many cultures before framing the focus of this article on visual artwork produced in the west in the 20th and 21st century. Many mathematical developments inspired artists in the 20th century, in these works the mathematics was not the focus but used as metaphors with transcendent experiences. Mathematical models have captivated and inspired artists who have created guided by intuition and pattern not necessarily a strict following of a mathematical equation. Artists re-discover mathematical ideas like the Mobius Strip and Riemann Surfaces, through artistic experimentation. 

The introduction of computers fostered fascination with visualizations and mathematical curiosities, some images were just visualizations, but some mathematicians and computer sciences started to use computers as its own artistic medium. Carlos Sequin presented "Art, Math and Computers: New Ways of Creating Pleasing Shapes" at the first Bridges Conference, explaining his process of using a computer to virtually design complex geometric shapes similar to minimal surfaces that could be sculpted out of wood. 

Art with underlying mathematical themes and processes became popular in the mathematical community in the 21st century, with support of established organizations like Bridges. Mathematical Art is still performed among people who primarily identify as artists, but increasingly there have been mathematicians who have found artistic expression through mathematical art. 

In discussing what is mathematical art the article shares that mathematical art recently has be characterized as a subfield of mathematics. In Farris' 2021 article Mathematical Art as a Discipline he claims that mathematical art has become a discipline in its own right. George Hart places math/art within mathematics, and a liminal space in between. Mathematics connects to art in a variety of ways. They ask what if the focus on mathematical art as a form of creative expression over its practical purpose? 

The article shifts to share the characteristics of a manifesto, sourcing from Hart's 2024 article What Can We Say About Math/Art"? he posed the question of if a mathematical art manifesto should be the goal, sharing that he believes that there is not enough consensus on the core values of mathematical art. Futamura shares that while the first Futurist Manifesto was written in 1909 over 50 more were written over the next decade, concluding that a group with common views can come together and write separate manifestos. While there are many different styles and content that can come together in a manifesto, from poetic forms to short numbered declarations, there is a general three step formula developed by Marinetti that many follow. 

Steps:

1. Identify and define an established Paradigm in art.

2. Criticize the paradigm ( with strong passion)

3. Introduce a new paradigm to counter the old (again with strong passion).

Marinetti declares that a good manifesto "must have violence and precision, a specific accusation and a well-defined insult, wit and bombast, and a sense of style that mimics the art itself." (Futamura, 2025, p. 592)

The article shares specific artworks that may or may not be considered mathematical art, these are works that are not by known mathematical artists, followed by quotes from mathematical artists. 

One of the works shared in the list was John Sims, Seeing Pi, felt fitting with Pi day coming up and was the only fiber arts based piece on the list. 

Math artist John Sims is living a life of pi. QUARTZ. (2022, July 20). https://qz.com/quartzy/1571241/pi-day-math-artist-john-sims-creates-a-life-of-pi

"It is art that embraces the spirit, Language and process of mathematics. Both maths and art are concerned with truth, but they differ in their ways of searching for it. Maths uses analysis and proof; art uses the senses and emotions. But maths can harness the spirit of creativity and art can be analytical. Together they form a great alliance for understanding the world around us.

John Sims, Artist

(Futamura, 2025, p. 593)

Futamura concludes the article sharing examples of rejected paradigms from art manifestos, and that many more can be found in 100 Artists' Manifestos edited by Alex Danchev.

 

Stop 1: "if an artist decides that their art is mathematical art, then it is." (Futamura, 2025, p. 590)

I wonder if in their intention of this statement they were saying, mathematics just is and the line of weather art is mathematical art is in the artists acknowledgement of such, because it is present, it exists, so is it the naming, acknowledging, and seeing of it by the artist that is the determining factor. 


Stop 2: "'Mathematics creates art'; 'Mathematics is art'; 'Mathematics renders artistic images'; 'Hidden mathematics an be discovered in art'; 'Mathematics analyzes art'; 'Mathematical ideas can be taught through art'" (Futamura, 2025, p. 591)

I really enjoyed this quote, the lens for art and math are so rooted in each other and I appreciated the way this quote summarized that. 

I was intrigued by the works by Felix Klein and Alfred Clebsch that the article mentioned and looked up some of their works and saw similarities of these curved images and structures to the work Nick Sayers shared in their interview. Multiple points in the article there was mention of violence in writing  manifestos, I found this to be a jarring word, after my first read through I wondered if its use was more intended to be provocative and invoke a reaction or feeling, if that's what their intent with the manifesto and with their use of words like violence in their description of it, when I started to reframe it with that as the intent I additionally considered the nude art pieces that Nick mentioned in the interview and how that could also be considered provocative to invoke a reaction or feeling.


Question:

What do you think defines mathematical art for you? Does it just exist? Are there specific defining features that are needed?


Futamura, F. (2025). Writing a Mathematical Art Manifesto. Bridges Conference, 589–594.

Math artist John Sims is living a life of pi. QUARTZ. (2022, July 20). https://qz.com/quartzy/1571241/pi-day-math-artist-john-sims-creates-a-life-of-pi

Week 8 Reading Reflection

 Article Summary: Can zombies write mathematical poetry? Mathematical poetry as a model for humanistic mathematics Karaali introduces this w...